Stream vs Heidi AI

Two different approaches to AI documentation: persistent clinical context versus encounter-level AI note generation.

Speed is great. Speed + Context is better.

Stream vs Heidi AI

Two different approaches to AI documentation: persistent clinical context versus encounter-level AI note generation.

Speed is great. Speed + Context is better.

Stream vs Heidi AI

Two different approaches to AI documentation: persistent clinical context versus encounter-level AI note generation.

Speed is great. Speed + Context is better.

The difference only becomes clear over time

The difference only becomes clear over time

Illustrative example: encounter-based notes accumulate as separate documents, while Stream builds a living, problem-based record across visits.

Illustrative example: generic AI scribes produce more documents; Stream creates a living, problem-based record that grows in usefulness.
Illustrative example: generic AI scribes produce more documents; Stream creates a living, problem-based record that grows in usefulness.
Illustrative example: generic AI scribes produce more documents; Stream creates a living, problem-based record that grows in usefulness.

On the first visit, Stream and Heidi often feel similar. You speak, and a note gets done faster than typing — which is genuinely helpful.

But clinical care is longitudinal. The real work happens on the second visit, the fifth visit, and the follow-up you didn’t expect. That’s where tools diverge.

Heidi is designed to generate fast, encounter-level notes. Each visit produces a new document that lives alongside the others. Over time, clinicians are left to mentally reconstruct the patient story from a growing pile of disconnected notes.

Stream is built differently. From the start, documentation is organized by patient and by medical problem. Each visit updates existing problem narratives instead of starting over. Context is pulled forward automatically, so Stream becomes more useful with every encounter.

Who Stream is Built for — The Short Answer

Who Stream is Built for — The Short Answer

Stream is designed for clinicians who want documentation to accumulate meaning over time, organized by medical problem.

Stream

Primary care and specialty clinicians managing chronic conditions, longitudinal care, and complex patient histories.

Heidi AI

Clinicians who primarily want well-written documentation that fits their templates with minimal configuration.

Documentation Philosophy

Documentation Philosophy

Stream treats documentation as a longitudinal clinical record, organized by persistent medical problems.

Heidi AI focuses on generating clear, well-written clinical notes for individual encounters.

Feature & Pricing Comparison

Features

Stream

Heidi

Patient Memory

Manual linkage of up to 3 prior encounters

Templates

Yes - encounter based

Document Ingestion

Yes - used for today's note as context

Coding

ICD & SNOMED

Task Management

Tied to each encounter

Price

$99/month

Free Trial

14 Days

Workflow, Step by Step

Workflow, Step by Step

Before the Visit

Stream allows clinicians to review prior problems, notes, and context before the visit.

Heidi AI typically begins each visit without structured access to problem-level longitudinal history.

During the Visit

Stream structures documentation by problem during the visit and incorporates prior narrative automatically.

Heidi AI transcribes and summarizes the current encounter into a complete note.

After the Visit

Stream produces documentation, tasks, and structured updates that persist into future visits.

Heidi AI produces finalized encounter notes without built-in longitudinal carry-forward.

Across Visits

Stream links documentation across visits by problem, reducing redocumentation and drift.

Heidi AI treats visits largely as standalone events.

Stream Features

Structure & Organization

Structure & Organization

Stream uses problem-based organization as the primary unit of documentation.

Heidi AI organizes notes primarily by encounter rather than by problem.

Context & Continuity

Context & Continuity

Stream actively reuses prior narrative to improve accuracy and completeness over time.

Heidi AI relies mainly on current-visit information. Users can manually link up to 3 encounters for additional context.

EHR & Practice Fit

EHR & Practice Fit

Stream is designed to work across diverse EHRs and practice types without enterprise lock-in.

Heidi AI is often used as a note-generation layer on top of existing EHR workflows.

Control & Customization

Control & Customization

Stream offers deep customization of templates, problem structure, and documentation style.

Heidi AI emphasizes ease of use and polished note output with fewer structural controls.

Tradeoffs & When Each Tool Makes Sense

Tradeoffs & When Each Tool Makes Sense

Clinicians who prefer minimal setup and do not need longitudinal chart memory may find Stream more than necessary.

Heidi AI excels at producing clean, readable encounter notes with minimal clinician input.

Strengths at a Glance

Strengths at a Glance

Stream
  • Problem-based documentation

  • Longitudinal context across visits

  • Custom templates

  • Task extraction

Heidi
  • Clean AI-generated notes

  • Minimal setup

  • Readable summaries

The Bottom Line

The Bottom Line

Different tools for different documentation needs

If you value continuity, problem tracking, and documentation that improves over time, Stream offers capabilities Heidi AI does not prioritize.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Stream generate polished notes like Heidi AI?

Can Heidi AI track problems over time?

Is Stream harder to use than Heidi AI?

Does Stream generate polished notes like Heidi AI?

Can Heidi AI track problems over time?

Is Stream harder to use than Heidi AI?

Does Stream generate polished notes like Heidi AI?

Can Heidi AI track problems over time?

Is Stream harder to use than Heidi AI?